Classic DfM: From 2D to 3D (2025)

References

  1. Balasinski, A.: Semiconductors: Integrated Circuit Design for Manufacturability. CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton (2011)

    Book Google Scholar

  2. Yang, J.: Manufacturability aware design. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan (2007)

    Google Scholar

  3. Schellenberg, F.M.: Sub-wavelength lithography using OPC. In: Semiconductor Fabtech (edn. 9), Semiconductor Media Ltd, London, UK, pp. 205–209 (1999)

    Google Scholar

  4. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors no 7, http://public.itrs.net/

  5. Nassif, S.R.: Delay variability: Sources, impacts and trends. pp. 638–639. ISSCC, (2000)

    Google Scholar

  6. Optical Lithography Cost of Ownership – Final Report, http://www.sematedi.org/docubase/document/4014atr.pdf (2000)

  7. Liebmann, W.: Resolution enhancement techniques in optical lithography: It’s not just a mask problem. Proc. SPIE. 4409, 23–32 (2001)

    Article Google Scholar

  8. Levenson, M.D.: Wavefront engineering from 500 nm to 100 nm CD. Optical microlithography X. Proc. SPIE. 3051, 2–13 (1997)

    Article Google Scholar

  9. Gupta, P., Kahng, A.B., Sylvester, D., Yang, J., Performance-driven optical proximity correction for mask cost reduction, J. Micro/Nanolithography MEMS MOEMS (6) 3 031005 (Jul 2007)

    Google Scholar

  10. Lin, B.: Phase shifting masks gain an edge. IEEE Circuits. Dev. 9, 28–35 (1993)

    Google Scholar

  11. Nassif, S.R.: Modeling and forecasting of manufacturing variations. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Statistical Metrology, pp. 3–10 (2000)

    Google Scholar

  12. Ma, S.T., Keshavarz, A., De, V., Brews, J.R.: A statistical model for extracting geometry sources of transistor performance variation. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 51(1), 36–41 (2004)

    Article Google Scholar

  13. Orshansky, M., Milor, L., Hu, C.: Characterization of spatial intrafield gate CD variability, its impact on circuit performance, and spatial mask-level correction. IEEE Trans. Semiconduct. Manuf. 17(1), 2–11 (2004)

    Article Google Scholar

  14. Visweswariah, C.: Death, taxes and failing chips. In: Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference, pp. 343–347 (2003)

    Google Scholar

  15. Agrawal, A.B., Blaauw, D., Zolotov, V., Vrudhula, S.: Statistical timing analysis using bounds and selective enumeration. In: Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference, pp. 348–353 (2003)

    Google Scholar

  16. Orshansky, M., Keutzer, K.: A general probabilistic framework for worst case timing analysis. In: Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference, pp. 556–561 (2002)

    Google Scholar

  17. Postnikove, S., Hector, S.: ITRS CD error budgets: Proposed simulation study methodology. (2003)

    Google Scholar

  18. Chen, L., Milor, L., Ouyang, C., Maly, W., Peng, Y.: Analysis of the impact of proximity correction algorithms on circuit performance. IEEE Trans. Semiconduct. Manuf. 12(3), 313–322 (1999)

    Article Google Scholar

  19. Stine, B., Boning, D., Chung, J., Ciplickas, D., Kibarian, J.: Simulating the impact of poly-CD wafer-level and die-level variation on circuit performance. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Statistical Metrology, pp. 24–27 (1997)

    Google Scholar

  20. Orshansky, M., Milor, L., Chen, P., Keutzer, K., Hu, C.: Impact of spatial intrachip gate length variability on the performance of high-speed digital circuits. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided. Des. Integr. Circuits. Syst. 21, 544–553 (2002)

    Article Google Scholar

  21. Gupta, P., Heng, F.L.: Toward a systematic-variation aware timing methodology. In: Proceedings of the Design Automation Conference, pp. 321–326 (2004)

    Google Scholar

  22. Liebmann, L.W.: Layout impact of resolution enhancement techniques: Impediment or opportunity. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Physical Design, pp. 110–117 (2003)

    Google Scholar

  23. Bowman, K.A,. Meindl, J.D.: Impact of within-die parameter fluctuations on future maximum clock frequency distributions. CICC, San Diego, CA, pp. 229–232 (2001)

    Google Scholar

  24. Berkeley Predictive Technology Model, http://www-device.eecs.berkeley.edu/ptm

  25. Kahng, A.B.: The road ahead: Shared red bricks. IEEE Des. Test. Del, Mar, CA (2002)

    Google Scholar

  26. Bowman, K.A., Duvall, S.G., Meindl, J.D.: Impact of die-to-die and within-die parameter fluctuations on the maximum clock frequency distribution. In: IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, San Francisco, CA, pp. 278–279 (2001)

    Google Scholar

  27. Zhang, W., Yang, Z.: A new threshold voltage model for deep-submicron MOSFET’s with nonuniform substrate dopings. In: Proceedings of the Electron Devices Meeting, pp. 39–41 (1997)

    Google Scholar

  28. Boning, D., Nassif, S.: Design of high-performance μP circuits, chapter 6: Models of process variation in device and interconnect, pp. 98–116 (1998)

    Google Scholar

  29. Park, T., et al.: Pattern and process dependencies in copper damascene chemical mechanical polishing processes. In: VLSI Multilevel Interconnect Conference, Santa Clara (1998)

    Google Scholar

  30. Hymes, S., Smekalin, K., Brown, T., Yeung, H., Joffe, M., Banet, M., Park, T., Tugbawa, T., Boning, D., Nguyen, J., West, T., Sands W: Determination of the planarization distance for copper CMP process. In: Materials Research Society 1999 Spring Meeting, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar

  31. Orshansky, M., Milor, L., Chen, P., Keutzer K., Hu, C.: Impact of systematic spatial intra-chip gate length variability on performance of high-speed digital circuits. IEEE Int. Conf. Comput-Aided. Des, New York, NY, pp. 62–67 (2000)

    Google Scholar

  32. Wong, S.-C., Lee, G.-Y., Ma, D.-J.: Modeling of interconnect capacitance, delay and crosstalk in VLSI. IEEE Trans. Semiconduct. Manuf. 40(1), 108–111 (2000)

    Article Google Scholar

  33. Chen, K., Hu, C., Fangm, P., Lin, M.R., Wollesen, D.L.: Predicting CMOS speed with gate oxide and voltage scaling and interconnect loading effects. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 44(11), 1951–1957 (1997)

    Article Google Scholar

  34. Gupta, P., Heng, F.-L., Lavin, M.: Merits of cellwise model-based OPC. In: Proceedings SPIE International Symposium on Microlithography (2004)

    Google Scholar

  35. Spence, C., et al.: Mask data volume – Historical perspective and future requirements. In: Proceedings SPIE 22nd European Mask and Lithography Conference, vol. 6281, (2006)

    Google Scholar

  36. Nair, R., Berman, C.L., Hauge, P.S., Yoffa, E.J.: Generation of performance constraints for layout. IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided. Des. 8(8), 860–874 (1989)

    Article Google Scholar

  37. Chen, C., Bozorgzadeh, E., Srivastava, A., Sarrafzadeh, M.: Budget management with applications. Algorithmica. 261–275 (2002)

    Google Scholar

  38. http://www.mentor.com

  39. http://www.opencores.org

  40. Zhang, Y., Gray, R., Nagakawa, O.S., Gupta, P., Kamberian, H., Xiao, G., Cottle, R., Progler, C.: Interaction and balance of mask write time and design RET strategies. In: Proceedings of the SPIE Photomask, Japan (2005)

    Google Scholar

  41. Balasinski, A.: Optimizing IC design for manufacturability. Rec. Patents. Electr. Eng. Bentham. Sci. 1(3), 209–213 (2008)

    Article Google Scholar

  42. Cheng, Y.-C., Ou, T.-H., Feng, J.J.H., Tsai, J.J.H., Liu, R.-G., Huang, W.-C., Xiang, X.-G.: Practical approach to layout migration. US Patent Application 0161907, 30 June 2011

    Google Scholar

  43. Park, S.: Photolithography method. US Patent Application 0171585, 14 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  44. Shieh, M.-F., Yu, S.-S., Yen, A., Yu, S.-M., Chang, C.-Y., Xu, J.J., Wann, C.H.: Integrated circuit layout design. US Patent Application 0151359, 23 June 2011

    Google Scholar

  45. Roy, S., Chakraborty, K., Han, Y.: System and method for circuit design floorplanning. US Patent Application 0185328, 28 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  46. Gordin, R., Goren, D., Strang, S.E., Tallman, K.A., Tretiakov, Y.V.: Layout determining for wide wire on-chip interconnect lines. US Patent Application 0179392, 21 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  47. Yoda, K.: Method for designing semiconductor integrated circuit which includes metallic wiring connected to gate electrode and satisfies antenna criterion. US Patent Application 0165737, 7 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  48. Moreno, T.: Die package including multiple dies and lead orientation. US Patent Application 0169144, 14 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  49. Herold, K.: Methods of optical proximity correction. US Patent Application 0197169, 11 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar

  50. Irmatov, A., Belousov, A., Cadouri, E., Gratchev, A., Ryjov, A., Thenie, L.: Method and mechanism for extraction and recognition of polygons in an IC design. US Patent Application 0167400, 7 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  51. Lippincott, G.P.: OPC conflict identification and edge priority system. US Patent Application 0167394, 7 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  52. Lee, J.S.: Masks of semiconductor devices and methods of forming mask patterns. US Patent 7,655,362, 2 Feb 2010

    Google Scholar

  53. Gaur, I., et al.: Closed loop design for manufacturability process. US Patent Application 0127029, 29 May 2008

    Google Scholar

  54. Smayling, M.C.: Integrated circuit cell library with cell-level process compensation technique (PCT) application and associated methods. US Patent 7,979,829, 12 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  55. Kuo, H.W.: Method of design for manufacturing. US Patent 8,136,067, 13 Mar 2012

    Google Scholar

  56. Xue, J., Huang, J.S.: Etch-aware OPC model calibration by using and etch bias filter. US Patent Application 0179393, 21 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  57. Kojima, S., Toyama, M., Yoshidome, H., Ito, M.: Method for layout verification of semiconductor integrated circuit. US Patent Application 0088006, 14 Apr 2011

    Google Scholar

  58. Meterelliyoz, M., Song, P., Stellari, F.: Process variation on-chip sensor. US Patent 7,868,606, 11 Jan 2011

    Google Scholar

  59. Brunner, T.A., Greco, S.E., Liegl, B.R., Xiang, H.: System and method of predicting problematic areas for lithography in a circuit design. US Patent Application 0184715, 28 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  60. Hogan, W.M., Petranovic, D., Aslyan, A.: Stacked integrated circuit verification. US Patent Application 0185323, 28 July 2011

    Google Scholar

  61. Lin, K.-Y., Lin, Y.-L., Tsai, C.S., Wang, C.-H.: Design and verification of 3D integrated circuits. US Patent Application US20090319968 Al

    Google Scholar

  62. Hou, Y.-C., Cheng, Y.-C., Liu, R.-G., Lai, C-M., Cheng, Y.-K., Lin, C.-K., Chao, H.-S., Yeh, P.-H., Wu, M.-H., Ku, U-C., Ou, T.-H.: Table-based DFM for accurate post-layout analysis. US Patent 8,001,494, 16 Aug 2011

    Google Scholar

  63. Cheng, Y.-K., Chang, G.S., Liu, J., Chiao, H.-S.: System and method for design – for – manufacturability data encryption. US Patent 8,136,168, 13 Mar 2012

    Google Scholar

Download references

Classic DfM: From 2D to 3D (2025)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Jeremiah Abshire

Last Updated:

Views: 6038

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (74 voted)

Reviews: 89% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jeremiah Abshire

Birthday: 1993-09-14

Address: Apt. 425 92748 Jannie Centers, Port Nikitaville, VT 82110

Phone: +8096210939894

Job: Lead Healthcare Manager

Hobby: Watching movies, Watching movies, Knapping, LARPing, Coffee roasting, Lacemaking, Gaming

Introduction: My name is Jeremiah Abshire, I am a outstanding, kind, clever, hilarious, curious, hilarious, outstanding person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.